Comparisons
What each AI app builder actually outputs
Every tool in this category says "native". Almost none of them mean the same thing by it. Below is what sixteen builders actually generate, quoted from their own documentation rather than their homepages — because the homepage and the docs frequently disagree.
The word doing the most work in this market is native.
A tool that generates React Native through Expo will call its output native, and it has a defensible reason to: the app renders real platform views rather than a web page in a frame. A tool that generates Swift will also call its output native, and mean something different — a project that opens in Xcode, compiles with Apple’s toolchain, and contains no JavaScript runtime at all. A tool that generates a progressive web app will sometimes call that native too.
So the question worth asking a builder is not "is it native". It is what exactly do I get, and can I open it without you?
That question has a factual answer for every product here, and every vendor documents it somewhere — usually in the docs rather than on the landing page. The table below collects those answers with their sources. Where a vendor’s own pages contradict each other, that is noted instead of resolved, because guessing which page is current is not our job.
Sixteen builders, and what their own docs say
Output column quotes each vendor’s own documentation. Checked 28 August 2026. Pricing in the currency each vendor publishes.
| Product | What their docs say it outputs | Platforms | Entry price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Modaal | Native Swift and SwiftUI, native Kotlin and Compose. A real Xcode project and a real Android Studio project on your disk.How this works | iOS + Android | Free / €9 mo |
| Rork | "Rork writes a real Android Studio project in Kotlin." Rork Max builds "native SwiftUI apps… compiled with Xcode". Their docs add: "Rork used to build apps this way and no longer does for new projects" — referring to React Native. Rork Pro remains React Native and Expo.docs.rork.com | iOS + Android | From $25 mo; Max $200 moFull comparison |
| Bitrig | "Real Swift code you can ship to the App Store", delivered as "full Xcode projects".bitrig.com | iOS, iPadOS, tvOS, visionOS | Free / $25 moFull comparison |
| Nativeline | "Nativeline builds actual SwiftUI — not web wrappers." A macOS app, like Modaal.nativeline.ai | iOS, iPad, Mac. No Android. | From $25 mo |
| Superapp | Native Swift, with App Store submission handled in-product.superappp.com | iOS | See vendorFull comparison |
| Google AI Studio | "A Kotlin and Jetpack Compose project that you can preview in a browser-based emulator, install on a physical device, and publish to the Play Store."ai.google.dev | Android only | Free tier |
| Vibecode | "Your apps are built using React Native and Expo, which compile to native iOS and Android code."vibecodeapp.com | iOS + Android | Free / from $20 mo |
| a0.dev | "React Native (Expo) apps from text descriptions."a0.dev | iOS + Android + web | Free / from $20 mo |
| Newly (formerly Natively) | "True native code using React Native and Expo… Expo SDK 54, React Native with TypeScript."newly.app | iOS + Android | From $25 mo |
| RapidNative | "Full React Native + Expo source code."rapidnative.com | iOS + Android | Free / from $20 mo |
| CatDoes | "Expo React Native" — described as "native iOS and Android apps with native UI and gestures, not web wrappers".catdoes.com | iOS + Android | Free / from $17 mo |
| Replit | "Expo uses React Native to help you build apps for iOS, Android, and the web." Their docs also note Replit does not submit to the App Store for you.docs.replit.com | iOS + Android + web | See vendor |
| Bolt | "Bolt projects can be turned into mobile applications using Expo." Mobile is a documented path rather than the core product.support.bolt.new | Web first; Expo for mobile | See vendor |
| FlutterFlow | Flutter and Dart — a single codebase rendering through Flutter’s own engine on both platforms.flutterflow.io | iOS + Android | Free / from $39 mo |
| Lovable | React and Vite web applications. No native iOS output, no native Android output, no App Store submission.lovable.dev | Web | Free / paid tiersFull comparison |
| v0 (Vercel) | React and Tailwind web interfaces. No native mobile output.v0.dev | Web | Free / paid tiersFull comparison |
| Bubble | Web apps natively; mobile through a React Native add-on in public beta — "Our current version of React Native". Their docs state "there’s no way of exporting your application as code".manual.bubble.io | Web; iOS + Android in beta | See vendorFull comparison |
| Glide | Progressive web apps. Their documentation states Glide does not support App Store or Google Play publishing.glideapps.com | PWA only | Free / paid tiers |
Why the stack is worth caring about
For a lot of apps it genuinely is not. If you are validating an idea, an Expo app will get you to the App Store and real users will not notice or care. React Native is a serious framework with serious apps shipped on it, and anyone who tells you otherwise is selling something.
The stack starts to matter at three specific moments, and it is worth knowing whether any of them are in your future before you pick a tool.
When you need a platform capability the framework has not wrapped yet. Every cross-platform framework sits behind the platform it targets. Usually the gap is months and irrelevant. Occasionally the thing you need is the thing that is missing, and then you are writing a native module by hand — in which case you are doing native development anyway, just through a layer.
When someone else has to work on it. A native Swift project can be handed to any iOS developer. An Expo project can be handed to any React Native developer. Neither is harder to hire for in the abstract, but they are different hires, and the pool for one of them is much larger if your app is your company.
When you want to leave. This is the one that actually bites. Ask what happens to your project if you stop paying — whether you get the source, whether it builds without the vendor’s runtime, whether their SDK is threaded through your business logic. Several tools in the table above export a complete project you can open and build with nothing installed but the platform toolchain. Several do not. That difference is invisible on the day you sign up and total on the day you leave.
Where Modaal sits
Modaal generates native Swift and SwiftUI for iOS and native Kotlin and Compose for Android, as two real projects on your own disk. It runs on the AI agent you already pay for — Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini and nine others — with no per-token charge on top, and it works through Xcode rather than around it.
The honest limits, so you do not find them yourself later: it needs a Mac, it needs Xcode, and it assumes you are willing to look at code even if you are not writing it. If that sounds like friction rather than control, one of the browser-based tools above will serve you better and we would rather say so here than waste your afternoon.
What Modaal does that none of the tools above do is keep two native codebases in agreement. Duet shares the application logic across iOS and Android and enforces interface parity with fixtures replayed on both platforms — the build fails when the two disagree. Every other product here either targets one platform, or targets both by rendering through a shared runtime.
How we check these claims
Every output description above is quoted from the vendor’s own documentation, with the source linked, and dated. Where a vendor’s docs and marketing pages contradict each other we say so rather than picking the flattering reading.
Four products people ask about are deliberately missing: Choicely, x1, Emergent and OnSpace. Each of them describes its output in marketing terms we could not confirm against their own technical documentation. We would rather leave a gap than fill it with a guess, and we will add them the moment they publish something checkable.
This page gets re-verified before every republish. If you find something here that is out of date, tell us — the correction is more useful to us than the claim was.
Deeper comparisons
One page per product, each with pricing, an honest concession, and a recommendation against Modaal where that is the right answer.
- Rork Alternatives: Native iOS Without Rork MaxRork Max is $200/mo for native iOS. Rork Free is 35 credits and web apps only. Modaal builds a real native Swift app free, unlimited prompts, Pro €9/month.
- Bitrig Alternative: Free, UnmeteredBitrig Free caps you at 10 requests and 15 credits a day. Modaal Free has no prompt cap at all, builds iOS or Android, and Pro is €9/month against their $25.
- Bubble Alternative for Native Mobile Apps (2026)Bubble’s native mobile is React Native and in public beta, and Bubble states apps cannot be exported as code. If you came to Bubble for a mobile app, here are your options.
- Superapp Alternative for iOS and AndroidSuperapp builds native Swift in the browser with no Mac required, and says it does not build Android. Where each one fits, using both vendors’ own words.
- Modaal vs Claude Code — Not a VersusClaude Code is one of the agents Modaal runs on, not a competitor. What each does, and when you only need one of them.
- Modaal vs Lovable (2026): Native or Web AppsLovable builds web apps and says so in its own FAQ. Modaal builds native iOS and Android. A sourced comparison on output, pricing model, code ownership and who each is for.
- Modaal vs Xcode: What the Paid Layer AddsModaal is not an Xcode alternative — it builds through Xcode. Xcode is free and has AI built in. Here is what the extra layer is actually for.
- Can Lovable Build Mobile Apps?Lovable builds web applications and documents two wrapper routes to a phone. Here is what that gets you, in their words, and when it is not enough.
- Can v0 Build Native iOS Apps?v0 generates React and Next.js for the web — not Swift, and not React Native. Here is what that means for shipping to the App Store, and how to take a v0 prototype native.
Frequently asked questions
There is no technical definition of either, which is why both get used so loosely. The checkable question is what language the code is in and what compiles it. Swift compiled by Xcode and Kotlin compiled by the Android toolchain are native in the narrowest sense. React Native through Expo renders real platform views from JavaScript. A progressive web app is a website. All three get marketed with the same word.
Not by itself. Apple approves apps built with React Native, Flutter and Swift alike, and many of the largest apps on the store are cross-platform. What gets apps rejected is usually metadata, permissions, payment handling or thin functionality, not the framework.
Most export something. The question worth asking each vendor is narrower: does the exported project build with nothing installed but the standard platform toolchain, or does it need their SDK, their runtime or their account? Ask before you sign up, not after.
Because for a lot of projects one of them is the right answer, and a comparison page that never reaches that conclusion is not a comparison. Modaal needs a Mac, Xcode and an agent subscription. If you want to build an app in a browser tab on a Windows laptop this afternoon, nothing on this page is going to change that, and we would rather be the page that told you honestly.
Before every republish, and immediately when a vendor changes what they ship. Rork moved from React Native to native Swift and Kotlin in early 2026 and Google AI Studio added Kotlin and Compose generation in May 2026 — both changes made earlier versions of comparisons like this one wrong.
Start building for free
Build for as long as you want on the Free plan. Only upgrade when you're ready to launch.